|
from What do clinical studies say?
Review of study: Cochran, B. N & Cauce, A. M (March, 2006). Characteristics of lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender individuals entering substance abuse treatment. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 30, 135-146.
by James E. Phelan, LCSW, CADAC, Psy.D
March 27, 2006 -
Previous studies looking at correlations between sexual orientation and
substance abuse had been criticized largely because of sampling issues. The
samples in earlier studies were mainly drawn in places where lesbian, gay,
bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) individuals congregated socially (namely, gay
bars).
The criticisms, therefore, were that these samples overestimated the prevalence
of substance abuse problems and pathology within the LGBT community. However,
the present study, supported in part by a grant from the National Institute of
Drug Abuse, gathered its sample outside of social arenas. The researchers
compared substance abuse problems, psychopathology, and medial service
utilization of both heterosexuals and non-heterosexuals in a sample size of over
17,000. Both groups were studied on matched criteria, that being that they had
to be over 18 year of age and entered into a state-approved chemical treatment
program. Therefore, the researchers claim that their study provides a more
representative sample of both groups when investigating their substance abuse
characteristics.
The findings of the study showed that openly LGBT individuals enter treatment
with more severe substance abuse problems, greater psychopathology, and greater
medical service utilization when compared to heterosexual clients.
As it related to substance abuse issues, the findings showed that while
heterosexuals are more likely to endorse alcohol as a primary drug of abuse,
LGBT steered toward harder substances such as methamphetamines and crack. LGBT
clients used drugs of abuse more frequently than their heterosexual
counterparts.
In terms of psychopathology, LGBT clients took psychotropic medications in twice
the proportion of heterosexual clients. As far as domestic violence, openly LGBT
were significantly more likely to be victims of domestic violence than the
heterosexual population. In terms of overall health care utilization, LGBT
individuals more frequently sought services than heterosexual individuals. When
it came to interfacing with the legal system, however, heterosexuals were more
likely to have legal involvements than LGBTS clients.
In conclusion, the researchers state "Although theses findings cannot resolve
the question of why LGBT individuals might abuse substances, the results point
to a pattern of more severe problems among openly LGBT clients than among
heterosexual clients." (p. 144).
This study adds weight to the many other discussions citing greater pathologies
within the LGBT population. The authors, however, want to use the findings to
justify more "LGBT-specific substance abuse treatment programs." In spite of
this, the Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment should be congratulated for
publishing the findings.
Updated: 8 February 2008
|